View the essay submitted
During my sophomore year, I challenged a long-standing tradition at my high school: the “senior-freshman hierarchy,” where underclassmen were expected to carry equipment, clean up after events, and remain silent in student council meetings. As a newly elected sophomore representative, I was told, “That’s just how it works.” But something about that didn’t sit right with me. Why should leadership be defined by silence for some and dominance for others? I started asking questions—not just to my peers, but to teachers and alumni. What began as quiet resistance became a campaign for equity. I proposed a new model for student leadership, one that included voting rights and responsibilities for all grade levels. There was pushback. “You’re too young to understand tradition,” some said. But I kept showing up, documenting how the old system stifled participation and discouraged engagement. Eventually, the council voted to adopt a new charter that gave all members equal standing. That experience taught me that challenging the status quo isn’t about rebellion—it’s about reimagining what’s possible when everyone has a voice. It also showed me the value of persistence, even when you’re not the loudest person in the room.
Revised Essay by MIT Graduate to 429 words (requested to maximum 500 words)
During my sophomore year, I found myself questioning a deeply ingrained tradition at my high school: the "senior-freshman hierarchy." This system dictated that underclassmen were relegated to menial tasks like carrying equipment and cleaning up after events, while their voices were silenced in student council meetings. As a newly elected sophomore representative, I was told, "That's just how it works."
However, my innate curiosity and passion for equitable systems compelled me to probe deeper. Why should leadership be defined by silence for some and dominance for others? This question ignited a spark within me, driving me to seek answers not only from my peers but also from teachers and alumni. What began as a quiet inquiry evolved into a full-fledged campaign for equity.
Leveraging my analytical skills, I meticulously documented how the existing hierarchy stifled participation and discouraged engagement. I proposed a new model for student leadership, one that incorporated voting rights and responsibilities for all grade levels. This proposal was not just about dismantling an outdated system; it was about engineering a more inclusive framework that empowered every student to contribute meaningfully.
The path was fraught with resistance. "You're too young to understand tradition," some argued. Yet, I remained undeterred, driven by the belief that true innovation often requires challenging the status quo. I presented data-driven evidence to the council, highlighting the benefits of a more inclusive approach. My persistence paid off when the council voted to adopt a new charter granting equal standing to all members.
This experience was transformative. It taught me that challenging established norms is not merely an act of rebellion; it is an opportunity to reimagine what is possible when everyone has a voice. It also reinforced the importance of persistence and strategic thinking, even when you are not the loudest person in the room.
As I reflect on this journey, I realize that my passion for STEM and problem-solving was instrumental in driving this change. The same analytical mindset that I apply to engineering challenges enabled me to dissect and reconstruct a social system. This experience has solidified my commitment to using my technical skills to innovate and create equitable solutions in any field I pursue.
In conclusion, questioning a belief or idea is not just about seeking change for its own sake. It is about envisioning a future where systems are designed to be inclusive and empowering for all. This mindset will continue to guide me as I embark on my journey at MIT, where I am eager to collaborate with like-minded individuals to push the boundaries of what is possible.